|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] x86/paging: Rename paging_mark_pfn_dirty() and use pfn_t
>>> On 14.12.16 at 15:26, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> paging_mark_gfn_dirty() actually takes a pfn, even by paramter name. Rename
> the function and alter the type to pfn_t to match.
>
> Push pfn_t into the LOGDIRTY_IDX() macros, and clean up a couple of local
> variable types in paging_mark_pfn_dirty().
>
> Leave an explicit comment in vmx_vcpu_flush_pml_buffer() when we intentally
> perform a straight conversion from gfn to pfn.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
with two remarks:
> @@ -331,8 +331,8 @@ void paging_mark_gfn_dirty(struct domain *d, unsigned
> long pfn)
> if ( changed )
> {
> PAGING_DEBUG(LOGDIRTY,
> - "marked mfn %" PRI_mfn " (pfn=%lx), dom %d\n",
> - mfn_x(mfn), pfn, d->domain_id);
> + "marked mfn %" PRI_mfn " (pfn %" PRI_pfn "), dom %d\n",
> + mfn_x(mfn), pfn_x(pfn), d->domain_id);
Mind making the domain part canonical (i.e. d%d), and perhaps
even moving it to the front ("d%d: ...\n")?
> @@ -345,23 +345,23 @@ void paging_mark_gfn_dirty(struct domain *d, unsigned
> long pfn)
> /* Mark a page as dirty */
> void paging_mark_dirty(struct domain *d, mfn_t gmfn)
> {
> - unsigned long pfn;
> + pfn_t pfn;
>
> if ( !paging_mode_log_dirty(d) || !mfn_valid(gmfn) ||
> page_get_owner(mfn_to_page(gmfn)) != d )
> return;
>
> /* We /really/ mean PFN here, even for non-translated guests. */
> - pfn = get_gpfn_from_mfn(mfn_x(gmfn));
> + pfn = _pfn(get_gpfn_from_mfn(mfn_x(gmfn)));
>
> - paging_mark_gfn_dirty(d, pfn);
> + paging_mark_pfn_dirty(d, pfn);
> }
Looking at all of this, could patch 1 perhaps rename gmfn to mfn
in this function?
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |