[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] x86/HVM: don't calculate XSTATE area sizes in software
>>> On 01.06.16 at 17:35, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 01/06/16 16:06, Jan Beulich wrote: >> @@ -3440,42 +3440,24 @@ void hvm_cpuid(unsigned int input, unsig >> *eax = *ebx = *ecx = *edx = 0; >> break; >> } >> - /* EBX value of main leaf 0 depends on enabled xsave features */ >> - if ( count == 0 && v->arch.xcr0 ) >> - { >> - /* reset EBX to default value first */ >> - *ebx = XSTATE_AREA_MIN_SIZE; >> - for ( sub_leaf = 2; sub_leaf < 63; sub_leaf++ ) >> - { >> - if ( !(v->arch.xcr0 & (1ULL << sub_leaf)) ) >> - continue; >> - domain_cpuid(d, input, sub_leaf, &_eax, &_ebx, &_ecx, >> - &_edx); >> - if ( (_eax + _ebx) > *ebx ) >> - *ebx = _eax + _ebx; >> - } >> - } >> - >> - if ( count == 1 ) >> + switch ( count ) >> { >> + case 1: >> *eax &= hvm_featureset[FEATURESET_Da1]; >> - >> - if ( *eax & cpufeat_mask(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES) ) >> + if ( !(*eax & cpufeat_mask(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES)) ) >> { >> - uint64_t xfeatures = v->arch.xcr0 | >> v->arch.hvm_vcpu.msr_xss; >> - >> - *ebx = XSTATE_AREA_MIN_SIZE; >> - if ( xfeatures & ~XSTATE_FP_SSE ) >> - for ( sub_leaf = 2; sub_leaf < 63; sub_leaf++ ) >> - if ( xfeatures & (1ULL << sub_leaf) ) >> - { >> - if ( test_bit(sub_leaf, &xstate_align) ) >> - *ebx = ROUNDUP(*ebx, 64); >> - *ebx += xstate_sizes[sub_leaf]; >> - } >> - } >> - else >> *ebx = *ecx = *edx = 0; >> + break; >> + } >> + /* fall through */ >> + case 0: >> + /* >> + * Always read CPUID.0xD[ECX=0/1].EBX from hardware, rather than >> + * domain policy. It varies with enabled xstate, and the >> correct >> + * xcr0/xss are in context. >> + */ >> + cpuid_count(input, count, &dummy, ebx, &dummy, &dummy); >> + break; > > It would be helpful for my PKU bugfix if you could avoid collapsing this > into a fallthough, as the fallthough would need to be undone. > Otherwise, Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> Converting this back is easy to do, but I'll nevertheless wait for Wei's opinion re 4.7 inclusion, as otherwise I'll eventually need to rebase on top of yours anyway. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |