|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] docs/arm64: update the documention for loading XSM support
Julien Grall writes ("Re: [PATCH v2] docs/arm64: update the documention for
loading XSM support"):
> The new version looks good to me:
> Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>
>
> Can a native speaker (Ian, Konrad, George) double-check the wording)?
I found it rather difficult to read. See updated version, attached.
I dropped your ack because I want to be sure that the new version
still describes the actual behaviour. I kept Wei's release-ack.
Thanks,
Ian.
From bd8f24667d353a4c90203d51c1fdb42a66b79973 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fu Wei <fu.wei@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 19:07:09 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] docs/arm64: update the documention for loading XSM support
This patch updates the documentation for allowing detection of an XSM
module that lacks a specific compatible string.
(This mechanism was added in commit ca32012341f3,
"xen/arm64: check XSM Magic from the second unknown module.")
Signed-off-by: Fu Wei <fu.wei@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Release-acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt
b/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt
index ad98bf3..f3179d6 100644
--- a/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt
+++ b/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt
@@ -24,10 +24,29 @@ Each node contains the following properties:
string (which must always be present).
Xen will assume that the first module which lacks a more
- specific compatible string is a "multiboot,kernel" and that
- the second such is a "multiboot,ramdisk". Any subsequent
- modules which lack a specific compatiblity string will not
- receive any special treatment.
+ specific compatible string is a "multiboot,kernel".
+
+ Xen will examine each module, starting from the second
+ module that lacks a specific compatible string. Xen will
+ check each such module for the XSM Magic number:
+
+ - For a module which has the XSM Magic number: it will be
+ treated by Xen as if its compatible string was
+ "xen,xsm-policy";
+
+ - For a module which does not have the XSM Magic: the second
+ module lacking a compatible string will be treated by Xen as
+ if its compatible string was "multiboot,ramdisk"; for the
+ third and subsequent modules which lack a specific
+ compatible string, Xen will not apply any special treatment.
+
+ This means if the ramdisk module is present and does not have the
+ compatible string "multiboot,ramdisk", then it must always be the
+ second module.
+
+ Note: This XSM Magic detection behavior was introduced by Xen 4.7.
+ Xen 4.6 (and downwards) still requires the XSM module to have the
+ compatible string "xen,xsm-policy".
Xen 4.4 supported a different set of legacy compatible strings
which remain supported such that systems supporting both 4.4
--
1.7.10.4
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |