|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 03/13] xen/xsplice: Hypervisor implementation of XEN_XSPLICE_op (v7)
> > +# Enable/Disable xsplice support
> > +config XSPLICE
> > + bool "xsplice support"
> > + default y
> > + depends on HAS_XSPLICE
> > + ---help---
> > + Allows a running Xen hypervisor to be patched without rebooting.
> > + This is primarily used to patch an hypervisor with XSA fixes.
> > +
> > + If unsure, say Y.
> > +
> > endmenu
>
> I'm indifferent on the HAS_XSPLICE, you can drop that if you want to
> simply stuff.
OK, let me remove it. Thanks!
.. snip..
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_XSPLICE
> > + case XEN_SYSCTL_xsplice_op:
> > + ret = xsplice_control(&op->u.xsplice);
> > + copyback = 1;
> > + break;
> > +#endif
>
> Should the case statement still exist and not just return -ENOSYS?
> Otherwise we're needlessly going into arch_do_sysctl() just to get the
> same result.
There is some other code in that function, such as:
398
399 #ifdef TEST_COVERAGE
400 case XEN_SYSCTL_coverage_op:
401 ret = sysctl_coverage_op(&op->u.coverage_op);
402 break;
403 #endif
Which follows that pattern. I figured I would the same thing as the rest
of the code around it. It is not that neat ..
But I could also make this a bit neater and have the header file return
-ENOSYS, like this:
diff --git a/xen/common/sysctl.c b/xen/common/sysctl.c
index b81b8cd..a8355c5 100644
--- a/xen/common/sysctl.c
+++ b/xen/common/sysctl.c
@@ -461,12 +461,11 @@ long do_sysctl(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_sysctl_t)
u_sysctl)
ret = tmem_control(&op->u.tmem_op);
break;
-#ifdef CONFIG_XSPLICE
case XEN_SYSCTL_xsplice_op:
ret = xsplice_control(&op->u.xsplice);
- copyback = 1;
+ if ( ret != -ENOSYS )
+ copyback = 1;
break;
-#endif
default:
ret = arch_do_sysctl(op, u_sysctl);
diff --git a/xen/include/xen/xsplice.h b/xen/include/xen/xsplice.h
index 3c1b2e4..a0ae95e 100644
--- a/xen/include/xen/xsplice.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/xsplice.h
@@ -23,15 +23,18 @@ struct xsplice_patch_func {
uint8_t pad[24];
};
-int xsplice_control(struct xen_sysctl_xsplice_op *);
-
#ifdef CONFIG_XSPLICE
+int xsplice_control(struct xen_sysctl_xsplice_op *);
void do_xsplice(void);
struct bug_frame *xsplice_find_bug(const char *eip, int *id);
bool_t is_module(const void *addr);
bool_t is_active_module_text(unsigned long addr);
unsigned long search_module_extables(unsigned long addr);
#else
+static inline xsplice_control(struct xen_sysctl_xsplice_op *)
+{
+ return -ENOSYS;
+}
static inline void do_xsplice(void) { };
static inline struct bug_frame *xsplice_find_bug(const char *eip, int *id)
{
Yeah, let me roll that in.
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |