|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] x86/xsave: use alternative asm on xsave side.
>>> On 02.02.16 at 08:11, <shuai.ruan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/xstate.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/xstate.c
> @@ -248,24 +248,26 @@ void xsave(struct vcpu *v, uint64_t mask)
> uint32_t hmask = mask >> 32;
> uint32_t lmask = mask;
> int word_size = mask & XSTATE_FP ? (cpu_has_fpu_sel ? 8 : 0) : -1;
> +#define XSAVE(pfx) \
> + alternative_io_3(".byte " pfx "0x0f,0xae,0x27\n", \
> + ".byte " pfx "0x0f,0xae,0x37\n", \
> + X86_FEATURE_XSAVEOPT, \
> + ".byte " pfx "0x0f,0xc7,0x27\n", \
> + X86_FEATURE_XSAVEC, \
> + ".byte " pfx "0x0f,0xc7,0x37\n", \
> + X86_FEATURE_XSAVES, \
> + "=m" (*ptr), \
> + "a" (lmask), "d" (hmask), "D" (ptr))
>
> if ( word_size <= 0 || !is_pv_32bit_vcpu(v) )
> {
> typeof(ptr->fpu_sse.fip.sel) fcs = ptr->fpu_sse.fip.sel;
> typeof(ptr->fpu_sse.fdp.sel) fds = ptr->fpu_sse.fdp.sel;
>
> - if ( cpu_has_xsaves )
> - asm volatile ( ".byte 0x48,0x0f,0xc7,0x2f"
> - : "=m" (*ptr)
> - : "a" (lmask), "d" (hmask), "D" (ptr) );
> - else if ( cpu_has_xsavec )
> - asm volatile ( ".byte 0x48,0x0f,0xc7,0x27"
> - : "=m" (*ptr)
> - : "a" (lmask), "d" (hmask), "D" (ptr) );
> - else if ( cpu_has_xsaveopt )
> + if ( cpu_has_xsaveopt || cpu_has_xsaves )
> {
> /*
> - * xsaveopt may not write the FPU portion even when the
> respective
> + * xsaveopt/xsaves may not write the FPU portion even when the
> respective
Apart from this line now being too long and hence the entire
comment needing re-formatting
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |