[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] x86/HVM: change the flags cpu context field to uint64_t



On 18/01/16 15:21, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 18.01.16 at 16:09, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> --- a/xen/include/public/arch-x86/hvm/save.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/public/arch-x86/hvm/save.h
>> @@ -161,8 +161,8 @@ struct hvm_hw_cpu {
>>      uint32_t error_code;
>>  
>>  #define _XEN_X86_FPU_INITIALISED        0
>> -#define XEN_X86_FPU_INITIALISED         (1U<<_XEN_X86_FPU_INITIALISED)
>> -    uint32_t flags;
>> +#define XEN_X86_FPU_INITIALISED         (1UL<<_XEN_X86_FPU_INITIALISED)
>> +    uint64_t flags;
>>  };
> How is the UL going to make this safe for a 32-bit consumer?
> Makes me think that, other than just said in reply to v1, it'll
> indeed be better to have a separate field (with a separate
> zero-check)... The (undesirable imo) alternative being to use
> 1L instead.

I am happy either way.  My R-b stands.

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.