Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 78395: regressions - FAIL

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 18.01.16 at 13:10, <osstest-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64  9 windows-install    fail REGR. vs. 
> 77892
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64  9 windows-install    fail REGR. vs. 
> 77892

Hmm, between all those XSM-related failures I didn't notice that
we've acquired an apparent regression here between 20c8f1a8a5
and 7167222b15 (based on this first failing in flight 78129). Oddly
enough the respective test-amd64-amd64-* tests don't exhibit
the issue, but none of the commits in between seem, at the first
glance, to affect 32-bit vs 64-bit Dom0 in different ways. Short
of anyone else having an idea, I guess we'll have to wait for a
bisect flight to complete.

Or wait - isn't the flag field introduction (commit a3b6844d3b)
incompatible, in that it fails to also add a 32-bit padding field?

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel