[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 4/4] xen/MSI: re-expose masking capability
>>> On 11.12.15 at 17:56, <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > For the original issue here, could the flag be exposed as a > XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_???? Yes, I think it could, albeit calling this a "capability" or "feature" seems odd (since really the original behavior was bogus/buggy). But - with sysctl not being a stable interface, is making qemu use this actually a good idea? I.e. won't we paint ourselves into the corner of needing to write compatibility wrappers in qemu whenever XEN_SYSCTL_physinfo (or its libxc wrapper) changes? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |