Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 65141: regressions - FAIL

["Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>]

> From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 9:51 PM
> >
> > According to
> > http://osstest.test-lab.xenproject.org/~osstest/pub/results/bisect/xen-un
> > stable/test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-intel.debian-hvm-install--l1
> > --l2.html
> > it was unable to reproduce a baseline, probably because it didn't have
> > enough historical data.
> 
> So I have run an adhoc test of the version of Xen tested by flight 64494,
> i.e. the one which passed on godello under the old jobÂname test-amd64-
> amd64-qemuu-nested but using the new name and current test harness and it
> was successful:
> 
> http://osstest.test-lab.xenproject.org/~osstest/pub/logs/65301/
> 
> I think that ought to give a baseline for the bisector to work with. I'll
> prod it to do so.
> 
> Given the number of commits I expect this is going to take a little while
> to produce results, given that the regression is already a week old it
> would be good if the VT-d maintainers could investigate in parallel.

Is the test case VT-d related? From earlier thread looks it's related to nested
virtualization?

I can't access above link. If you can help describe the test steps in
plain text, I can check whether we can reproduce locally.

Thanks
Kevin
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel