Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.6-testing test] 65112: regressions - FAIL

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.6-testing test] 65112: regressions 
- FAIL"):
> On 27.11.15 at 13:28, <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> --- a/README.email
> >> +++ b/README.email
> >> @@ -71,6 +71,24 @@ history.  Here are some examples:
> >>        detect regressions of this test.  Perhaps the test has been
> >>        recently introduced.
> >>  
> >> +   fail in 58948 REGR. vs. 63449
> 
> It seems confusing to me that the numbers are reversed from how
> I think they would normally appear (regressions normally being
> against older flights).

You mean the example would be less confusing with a different number ?
I'll change it.

Thanks,
Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel