Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.6-testing test] 65112: regressions - FAIL

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 27.11.15 at 13:28, <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 12:02 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> As explained below, in 65112 this step did not run because the earlier
>> step `guest-localmigrate' failed:
>>   http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65112/test-amd64- 
>> amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm/info.html
> 
> Would it be possible to arrange for "blocked" to appear somewhere in the
> results for the job? e.g. "blocked fail in XXX REGR. vs. YYY". README.email
> says "The results normally start with the result in this flight" and I
> think this would be in keeping with that.
> 
> Otherwise I think people naturally tend to just read the "and are blocking"
> section and forget to consider that non-blocking stuff further down may
> have (tolerably) failed but then blocking something else which is then
> blocking the push.

Indeed - that's precisely how I've looked at things this morning.

>> --- a/README.email
>> +++ b/README.email
>> @@ -71,6 +71,24 @@ history.  Here are some examples:
>>        detect regressions of this test.  Perhaps the test has been
>>        recently introduced.
>>  
>> +   fail in 58948 REGR. vs. 63449

It seems confusing to me that the numbers are reversed from how
I think they would normally appear (regressions normally being
against older flights).

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel