[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] build: remove .d files from xen/ on a clean
>>> On 25.11.15 at 14:07, <jonathan.creekmore@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Nov 25, 2015, at 2:58 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>>> On 24.11.15 at 19:19, <jonathan.creekmore@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>> On Nov 24, 2015, at 11:30 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> On 24.11.15 at 18:22, <jonathan.creekmore@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> On Nov 24, 2015, at 11:16 AM, Jonathan Creekmore >>>>> <jonathan.creekmore@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> So, the files in xen/ were the dependencies files for xen.efi and >>>>>> xen-syms that were getting left behind. $(DEPS) appears to always >>>>>> have â.*.dâ in it, based on me putting an echo into the clean rule to >>>>>> print it out. However, looking at this, I am also seeing â.dâ files left >>>>>> behind in xen/common/compat that I did not notice before. >>>>> >>>>> Actually, looking closer at it, xen/common/compat does not appear to be >>>>> cleaning at all, so I think that is a separate, unrelated issue. >>>> >>>> That would be quite related, as it would be a result of the same >>>> commit. >>> >>> Yeah, I now see where that change got introduced. I donât see a clear way >>> of > >>> cleaning >>> those objects files since the build system no longer goes into the >>> common/compat directory at >>> all. The existing clean rules walk all of the subdirectories, cleaning >>> object files and dependency >>> files as it goes. >> >> But wouldn't the way DEPS gets populated in xen/Rules.mk cover for >> this? If so, the alternative to your original patch might be to simply >> rm those ..xen*.o.d files right in the $(TARGET)-syms and >> $(TARGET).efi rules (along with their corresponding >> $(@D)/.$(@F).[0-9]* getting removed, due to which those .o.d >> ones are of no use anyway). Or maybe it should really do both, >> considering that *.o get removed by _clean too. >> > > So, I think we are talking a bit at cross purposes here. There are two > problems as I see it: > > 1. Dependency files get left in the xen/ directory for xen and xen-syms. > Those dependency files just started appearing in the xen/ directory when > the dependency generation was redone and the clean rule for the > top-level directory did not handle cleaning dependency files in the > top-level, because it has no source files. That is what my patch was > specifically aiming at fixing. The way DEPS gets populated in xen/Rules.mk > does cover it, but since DEPS was never in that top-level directory, it > wasnât clearing the dep files that were left in that directory. > > However, you could make the argument that the real problem is that the > dependency files are being dropped in that directory in the first place. Even if the rule deleted them, a failed or interrupted build could leave them there. I'll therefore apply your patch as is. > 2. The xen/common/compat directory is not being cleaned at all, although > there are .o and .o.d files left in that directory. My patch does not handle > that > and was never meant to handle that. Given the way the clean rule works, I > donât see how to clean out the files in that directory now that it is no > longer > in the subdir-y list without just special casing it, which is kind of gross. This actually points out a worse problem: Dependencies are currently broken for all the files built from their parent directory. I wrongly used $(basename ...) in the DEPS generation, which I'll send a patch for shortly. Once fixed, the "clean" aspect will be fixed at once. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |