[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v11 3/5] arm: introduce CONFIG_PARAVIRT, PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING and pv_time_ops
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:40:31PM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, Christopher Covington wrote: > > > Hi Stefano, > > > > > > On 11/20/2015 09:31 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 5 Nov 2015, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > >>> Introduce CONFIG_PARAVIRT and PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING on ARM. > > > >>> > > > >>> The only paravirt interface supported is pv_time_ops.steal_clock, so > > > >>> no > > > >>> runtime pvops patching needed. > > > >>> > > > >>> This allows us to make use of steal_account_process_tick for stolen > > > >>> ticks accounting. > > > >>> > > > >>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > >>> Acked-by: Christopher Covington <cov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > >>> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > >>> CC: linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > >>> CC: will.deacon@xxxxxxx > > > >>> CC: nico@xxxxxxxxxx > > > >>> CC: marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx > > > >>> CC: cov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > >>> CC: arnd@xxxxxxxx > > > >>> CC: olof@xxxxxxxxx > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Russell, > > > >> are you OK with this patch? > > > > > > > > Russell, > > > > > > > > I am going to drop this patch and add a small #ifdef to > > > > arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c to be able to use this functionality on arm64. > > > > > > > > If you change your mind let me know. > > > > > > It appears to me as though he's not copied on this message. > > > > He was. He is now in To:. > > I think the patch is fine. Thanks > Sorry, but I no longer read every email that passes by due to the amount > of email I now receive, and due to the nature of modern email clients with > their stupid ideas about how to formulate the To: and Cc: headers for > replies[*], I attach no significance to being mentioned in either the To: > or Cc: headers. > > Overall, what this means is it's now difficult to attact my attention to > any particular thread. Sorry about that, I have no solution to this > problem. FWIW as somebody that receives pretty large amounts of emails myself with my name in CC or To, I understand and I don't have a solution either :-( > * - modern mailers have started to preserve the To: and Cc: headers from > the message being replied to, which means that if I'm mentioned in the > To: header initially, my address stays in the To: header despite the > discussion not being directed _at_ me. Hence, deciding what to reply to > based on where my address appears in the headers is meaningless with > modern mail clients. > > -- > FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up > according to speedtest.net. > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |