[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v11 3/5] arm: introduce CONFIG_PARAVIRT, PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING and pv_time_ops
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:40:31PM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, Christopher Covington wrote: > > Hi Stefano, > > > > On 11/20/2015 09:31 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > >> On Thu, 5 Nov 2015, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > >>> Introduce CONFIG_PARAVIRT and PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING on ARM. > > >>> > > >>> The only paravirt interface supported is pv_time_ops.steal_clock, so no > > >>> runtime pvops patching needed. > > >>> > > >>> This allows us to make use of steal_account_process_tick for stolen > > >>> ticks accounting. > > >>> > > >>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >>> Acked-by: Christopher Covington <cov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >>> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >>> CC: linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > >>> CC: will.deacon@xxxxxxx > > >>> CC: nico@xxxxxxxxxx > > >>> CC: marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx > > >>> CC: cov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > >>> CC: arnd@xxxxxxxx > > >>> CC: olof@xxxxxxxxx > > >> > > >> > > >> Russell, > > >> are you OK with this patch? > > > > > > Russell, > > > > > > I am going to drop this patch and add a small #ifdef to > > > arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c to be able to use this functionality on arm64. > > > > > > If you change your mind let me know. > > > > It appears to me as though he's not copied on this message. > > He was. He is now in To:. I think the patch is fine. Sorry, but I no longer read every email that passes by due to the amount of email I now receive, and due to the nature of modern email clients with their stupid ideas about how to formulate the To: and Cc: headers for replies[*], I attach no significance to being mentioned in either the To: or Cc: headers. Overall, what this means is it's now difficult to attact my attention to any particular thread. Sorry about that, I have no solution to this problem. * - modern mailers have started to preserve the To: and Cc: headers from the message being replied to, which means that if I'm mentioned in the To: header initially, my address stays in the To: header despite the discussion not being directed _at_ me. Hence, deciding what to reply to based on where my address appears in the headers is meaningless with modern mail clients. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |