[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option
- To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 20:03:07 +0100
- Cc: "security@xxxxxxxxxx" <security@xxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, X86 ML <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 19:04:39 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On 29/07/15 15:43, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> FYI, I have got a repro now and am investigating.
Good and bad news. This bug has nothing to do with LDTs themselves.
I have worked out what is going on, but this:
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
index 5abeaac..7e1a82e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
@@ -493,6 +493,7 @@ static void set_aliased_prot(void *v, pgprot_t prot)
pte = pfn_pte(pfn, prot);
+ (void)*(volatile int*)v;
if (HYPERVISOR_update_va_mapping((unsigned long)v, pte, 0)) {
pr_err("set_aliased_prot va update failed w/ lazy mode
%u\n", paravirt_get_lazy_mode());
BUG();
Is perhaps not the fix we are looking for, and every use of
HYPERVISOR_update_va_mapping() is susceptible to the same problem.
The update_va_mapping hypercall is designed to emulate writing the pte
for v, with auditing applied. As part of this, it does a pagewalk on v
to locate and map the l1. During this walk, Xen it finds the l2 not
present, and fails the hypercall. i.e. v is not reachable from the
current cr3.
Reading the virtual address immediately before issuing the hypercall
causes Linux's memory faulting logic to fault in the l2. This also
explains why vm_unmap_aliases() appears to fix the issue; it is likely
to fault in enough of the paging structure for v to be reachable.
One solution might be to use MMU_NORMAL_PT_UPDATE hypercall instead,
which take the physical address of pte to update. This won't fail in
Xen if part of the paging structure is missing, and can be batched.
~Andrew
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
- References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option
|