[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 07/27/2015 11:53 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Boris Ostrovsky >> <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On 07/25/2015 01:36 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>>> >>>> Here's v3. It fixes the "dazed and confused" issue, I hope. It's also >>>> probably a good general attack surface reduction, and it replaces some >>>> scary code with IMO less scary code. >>>> >>>> Also, servers and embedded systems should probably turn off modify_ldt. >>>> This makes that possible. >>>> >>>> Xen people, can you take a look at this? >>>> >>>> Willy and Kees: I left the config option alone. The -tiny people will >>>> like it, and we can always add a sysctl of some sort later. >>>> >>>> Changes from v3: >>>> - Hopefully fixed Xen. >>> >>> >>> 32b-on-32b fails in the same manner. (but non-zero LDT is taken care of) >>> >>>> - Fixed 32-bit test case on 32-bit native kernel. >>> >>> >>> I am not sure I see what changed. >> >> I misplaced the fix in the wrong git commit, so I failed to sent it. >> Oops. >> >> I just sent v4.1 of patch 3. Can you try that? > > > > I am hitting BUG() in Xen code (returning from a hypercall) when freeing LDT > in destroy_context(). Interestingly though when I run the test in the > debugger I get SIGILL (just like before) but no BUG(). > > Let me get back to you on that later today. > > After forward-porting my virtio patches, I got this thing to run on Xen. After several tries, I got: [ 53.985707] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 53.986314] kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c:496! [ 53.986677] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP [ 53.986677] Modules linked in: [ 53.986677] CPU: 0 PID: 1400 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.2.0-rc4+ #4 [ 53.986677] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.7.5-0-ge51488c-20140602_164612-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014 [ 53.986677] task: c2376180 ti: c0874000 task.ti: c0874000 [ 53.986677] EIP: 0061:[<c10530f2>] EFLAGS: 00010282 CPU: 0 [ 53.986677] EIP is at set_aliased_prot+0xb2/0xc0 [ 53.986677] EAX: ffffffea EBX: cc3d1000 ECX: 0672e063 EDX: 80000000 [ 53.986677] ESI: 00000000 EDI: 80000000 EBP: c0875e94 ESP: c0875e74 [ 53.986677] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0069 [ 53.986677] CR0: 80050033 CR2: b77404d4 CR3: 020b6000 CR4: 00042660 [ 53.986677] Stack: [ 53.986677] 80000000 0672e063 000021c0 cc3d1000 00000001 cc3d2000 00000b4a 00000200 [ 53.986677] c0875ea8 c105312d c2317940 c2373a80 00000000 c0875eb4 c1062310 c01861c0 [ 53.986677] c0875ec0 c1062735 c01861c0 c0875ed4 c10a764e c7007a00 c2373a80 00000000 [ 53.986677] Call Trace: [ 53.986677] [<c105312d>] xen_free_ldt+0x2d/0x40 [ 53.986677] [<c1062310>] free_ldt_struct.part.1+0x10/0x40 [ 53.986677] [<c1062735>] destroy_context+0x25/0x40 [ 53.986677] [<c10a764e>] __mmdrop+0x1e/0xc0 [ 53.986677] [<c10c9858>] finish_task_switch+0xd8/0x1a0 [ 53.986677] [<c1863736>] __schedule+0x316/0x950 [ 53.986677] [<c1863d96>] schedule+0x26/0x70 [ 53.986677] [<c10ac613>] do_wait+0x1b3/0x200 [ 53.986677] [<c10ac9d7>] SyS_waitpid+0x67/0xd0 [ 53.986677] [<c10aa820>] ? task_stopped_code+0x50/0x50 [ 53.986677] [<c186717a>] syscall_call+0x7/0x7 [ 53.986677] Code: e8 c1 e3 0c 81 eb 00 00 00 40 39 5d ec 74 11 8b 4d e4 8b 55 e0 31 f6 e8 dd e0 fa ff 85 c0 75 0d 83 c4 14 5b 5e 5f 5d c3 90 0f 0b <0f> 0b 0f 0b 8d 76 00 8d bc 27 00 00 00 00 85 d2 74 31 55 89 e5 [ 53.986677] EIP: [<c10530f2>] set_aliased_prot+0xb2/0xc0 SS:ESP 0069:c0875e74 [ 54.010069] ---[ end trace 89ac35b29c1c59bb ]--- Is that the error you're seeing? If I change xen_free_ldt to: static void xen_free_ldt(struct desc_struct *ldt, unsigned entries) { const unsigned entries_per_page = PAGE_SIZE / LDT_ENTRY_SIZE; int i; vm_unmap_aliases(); xen_mc_flush(); for(i = 0; i < entries; i += entries_per_page) set_aliased_prot(ldt + i, PAGE_KERNEL); } then it works. I don't know why this makes a difference. (xen_mc_flush makes a little bit of sense to me. vm_unmap_aliases doesn't.) It's *possible* that there's some but in my code that causes a CPU to retain a reference to a stale LDT, but I don't see it. Hmm. Is it possible that, when a process exits, we kill the mm without synchronously unlazying it everywhere else? Seems a bit hard to imagine to me -- I don't see why this wouldn't blow up when the pgt went away. My best guess is that there's a silly race in which one CPU frees and LDT before the other CPU flushes its hypercalls. But I don't really believe this, because I got this trace: [ 14.257546] Free LDT cb912000: CPU0 cb923000 CPU1 cb923000 [OK] All 5 iterations succeeded root@(none):/# [ 15.824723] Free LDT cb923000: CPU0 (null) CPU1 (null) [ 15.827404] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 15.828349] kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c:497! [ 15.828349] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP with this patch applied: @@ -537,7 +542,9 @@ static void xen_set_ldt(const void *addr, unsigned entries) MULTI_mmuext_op(mcs.mc, op, 1, NULL, DOMID_SELF); - xen_mc_issue(PARAVIRT_LAZY_CPU); + xen_mc_flush(); + + this_cpu_write(cpu_ldt, addr); } so both CPUs on my VM have definitely zeroed their LDTs before the failing hypercall. Hmm. Looking at the hypervisor code, I don't see why setting the LDT to NULL is handled correctly. Am I missing something? --Andy _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |