[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [v10][PATCH 11/16] tools/libxl: detect and avoid conflicts with RDM
On 2015/7/21 23:09, Ian Jackson wrote: Chen, Tiejun writes ("Re: [v10][PATCH 11/16] tools/libxl: detect and avoid conflicts with RDM"):+static void +add_rdm_entry(libxl__gc *gc, libxl_domain_config *d_config, + uint64_t rdm_start, uint64_t rdm_size, int rdm_policy) +{ + d_config->num_rdms++; + d_config->rdms = libxl__realloc(NOGC, d_config->rdms, + d_config->num_rdms * sizeof(libxl_device_rdm)); + + d_config->rdms[d_config->num_rdms - 1].start = rdm_start; + d_config->rdms[d_config->num_rdms - 1].size = rdm_size; + d_config->rdms[d_config->num_rdms - 1].policy = rdm_policy; +}But, I wrote: Can I suggest a function void add_rdm_entry(libxl__gc *gc, libxl_domain_config *d_config, uint64_t rdm_start, uint64_t rdm_size, int rdm_policy) which assumes that d_config->num_rdms is set correctly, and increments it ? (Please put the increment at the end so that the assignments are to ->rdms[d_config->num_rdms], or perhaps make a convenience alias.) Note the last paragraph. This is now the third time I have posted that text. It is the fifth request or clarification I have had to make about this very small area. I have to say that I'm finding this rather frustrating. Sorry, I just ignore the line in brackets since I always think this kind of thing is often not a big deal, and next time I should pay more attention to the (). But indeed, before I post this whole patch online I also picked up this chunk of code to ask you to take a look that. This manner means I'm not very sure if I'm addressing this properly. But I didn't get a further response, so I guess that should work for you and then I posted the whole online. Now back on our problem, static void add_rdm_entry(libxl__gc *gc, libxl_domain_config *d_config, uint64_t rdm_start, uint64_t rdm_size, int rdm_policy) { d_config->rdms = libxl__realloc(NOGC, d_config->rdms, (d_config->num_rdms+1) * sizeof(libxl_device_rdm)); d_config->rdms[d_config->num_rdms].start = rdm_start; d_config->rdms[d_config->num_rdms].size = rdm_size; d_config->rdms[d_config->num_rdms].policy = rdm_policy; d_config->num_rdms++; }Does this work for you? If I'm still wrong, please correct this function directly to cost you less. Thanks Tiejun _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |