[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Regression in OSSTest Windows install test case
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 09:39:42AM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote: [...] > I think I found the semantic difference. Prior to this patch it would seem > that stdvga buffered writes even when not in stdvga mode. When I tested your > config (using cirrus), windows drops out of stdvga quite early in boot which > slows down the splash screen to a crawl. When I just uncommented the single > line 'stdvga=1' then I got through the splash screen several orders of > magnitude faster. > So, I think this (compile tested only) incremental patch should fix the test: > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/stdvga.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/stdvga.c > index 6d22b22..d528155 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/stdvga.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/stdvga.c > @@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ static int stdvga_mem_write(const struct hvm_io_handler > *han > }; > struct hvm_ioreq_server *srv; > > - if ( !s->cache ) > + if ( !s->cache || !s->stdvga ) > goto done; > > /* Intercept mmio write */ > @@ -503,9 +503,6 @@ static bool_t stdvga_mem_accept(const struct > hvm_io_handler > > spin_lock(&s->lock); > > - if ( !s->stdvga ) > - goto reject; > - > if ( p->dir == IOREQ_WRITE && p->count > 1 ) > { > /* > @@ -526,7 +523,7 @@ static bool_t stdvga_mem_accept(const struct > hvm_io_handler > > goto reject; > } > - else if ( p->dir == IOREQ_READ && !s->cache ) > + else if ( p->dir == IOREQ_READ && !s->cache && !s->stdvga ) > goto reject; > > /* s->lock intentionally held */ > > I can't say that I like the idea of unconditionally buffering VRAM writes, > but I'll test patch and post it. > Thank you for the fix. It fixes the problem for me. Tested-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> > Paul > > > > Wei. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |