Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 59472: regressions - FAIL

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 13.07.15 at 03:43, <osstest-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> flight 59472 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/59472/ 
> 
> Regressions :-(
> 
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 9 debian-hvm-install 
> fail REGR. vs. 58965

Considering (on italia1)

Jul 12 21:27:20.505103 (d1) No bootable device.
Jul 12 21:27:20.505128 (d1) Powering off in 30 seconds.

is this really a regression (rather than something that never fully
worked)? With flight 58917 also having (on chardonnay0)

Jun 27 11:08:08.025161 (d1) No bootable device.
Jun 27 11:08:08.033014 (d1) Powering off in 30 seconds.

is it possible that 58965's success (on elbling1) was because this only
works on a very limited subset of hosts? I didn't spot anything in the
logs of the failure cases that would help me understand the reason
for the failures...

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel