Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 1/7] libxl: get rid of the SEDF scheduler

[Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 17:26 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> George Dunlap writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 1/7] libxl: get rid of the 
> SEDF scheduler"):
> > On 07/06/2015 05:17 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:

> > I probably wouldn't even have bothered saying anything if I hadn't
> > already been replying to the e-mail because of the line below. :-)
> 
> Also, while public-facing API comments are only comments (only
> documentation), they are quite important.
> 
> A change like this:
> 
> > >>>  - mark the SEDF only parameter as deprecated in libxl_types.idl,
> > >>>    as requested during review.
> 
> warrants dropping an acked/reviewed-by (unless it was requested or
> suggested by the reviewer).
> 
Right, makes sense, and I see it now. Thanks. :-)

So, while you're here, should I send v4 with the 'budget' field moved
up?

Thanks and Regards,
Dario
-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel