[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2 1/3] xen/vm_access: Support for memory-content hiding
>>> On 26.06.15 at 11:49, <rcojocaru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sorry, I don't follow - I did truncate the data if bytes_per_rep > > curr->arch.vm_event.emul_read_data->size. But I'm passing reps on > untouched to hvmemul_do_pio(). Did I misunderstand the hvmemul_do_pio() > code? Should I pass a (*reps * bytes_per_rep) sized buffer to > hvmemul_do_pio() when its last parameter is != NULL? Just consider how REP OUTS works: It reads equally sized items from successive memory locations (one per iteration, with the memory address being incremented/decremented after each iteration) and sends them to the designated port (again once per iteration). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |