[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] stable trees (was: [xen-4.2-testing test] 58584: regressions)
>>> On 24.06.15 at 11:06, <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > After that baseline I ran a few tests of just the windows + qemuu stuff: > http://xenbits.xen.org/people/ianc/tmp/adhoc/37619/ > > was allowing free reign on the machines and was mostly successful, apart > from the windows-install failure on lake-frog. Looking at the test > history this seems to have always been a problem on the old infra. > *-frog are "AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6168" which is as close as the old > infra has to the new colos merlot[01] which is "AMD Opteron(tm) > Processor 6376". > > With that in mind I reran with things limited to the two frog-* boxes > and got http://xenbits.xen.org/people/ianc/tmp/adhoc/37624/. > > The windows-install of winxpsp3 persisted but there was no migration > failure elsewhere. > > It's not a lot of data, but in comparison with the results in the colo: > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-amd64-amd64 > -xl-qemuu-win7-amd64/xen-4.5-testing.html > it looks like it's the newer system which is exposing the issue. Thanks for doing all of this! While not pointing towards a solution on the side of the newer systems, it at least reassures us that we didn't release regressing software with 4.5.1. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |