[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] stable trees (was: [xen-4.2-testing test] 58584: regressions)
On Fri, 2015-06-19 at 10:51 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 18.06.15 at 16:22, <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-06-18 at 12:37 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >>> On 17.06.15 at 12:26, <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Jan Beulich writes ("stable trees (was: [xen-4.2-testing test] 58584: > >> > regressions)"): > >> >> Which leaves several options: > >> >> - the problem was always there, but hidden by some factor in the > >> >> old osstest instance, > >> > > >> > I think this is most likely. The old system had much older hosts. > >> > > >> > I think this is a race that we now happen to lose most of the time. > >> > >> For verification purposes, would it be possible to set up a couple of > >> flights on the old instance for one of the stable trees? > > > > I can try and run something adhoc on the old system if you can let me > > know exactly which jobs (test-*-*-*) and branches you are interested in. > > Any or all of test-amd64-*-xl-qemuu-win* (not sure whether you > can specify wildcards), and I guess stable-4.5 (or staging-4.5) > would be the most natural branch choice. I think the tools can do wildcards, yes. I've kicked off a full adhoc xen-4.5-testing flight so I have a local template to copy the jobs from for some repeated runs with just the problem flights (it's just easier to do that than to invent a cut-down flight from scratch...). > > Thanks, Jan > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |