[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST Nested PATCH v11 6/7] Compose the main recipe of nested test job
> -----Original Message----- > From: Ian Jackson [mailto:Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 11:20 PM > To: Pang, LongtaoX > Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx; wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx; Hu, > Robert > Subject: RE: [OSSTEST Nested PATCH v11 6/7] Compose the main recipe of nested > test job > > Pang, LongtaoX writes ("RE: [OSSTEST Nested PATCH v11 6/7] Compose the main > recipe of nested test job"): > ... > > (Ian C has answered some of your comments. On the others:) > > > > I think you probably want to run leak-check on the L1. > > > > > I have noticed the logs which printed on screen during job running, the > leak-check will > > be run on L1 at the end of testing. > > Or, do you mean that I should run leak-check on L1 after the L1 HVM guest > finishing installation? > > Maybe I am confused. > > I think that with your patches, leak-check would be run on the L0 > only. > > But leak-check ought to be run on the L1 as well. The basis would be > after nested-setup, xen-install and reboot I think (similar to the > position for the L0 basis). > > leak-check compares the set of objects present at the `leak-check > check' step with the set of objects present at the `basis' step, and > the check fails if there are any new objects. For this purpose, > objects includes domains, corefiles, etc. > OK, so the recipe in sg-run-job should be like below, please correct me if something wrong. proc need-hosts/test-nested {} {return host} proc run-job/test-nested {} { run-ts . = ts-debian-hvm-install + host nestedl1 run-ts . = ts-nested-setup + host nestedl1 run-ts . = ts-xen-install nestedl1 run-ts . = ts-host-reboot nestedl1 run-ts . = ts-leak-check nestedl1 + basis run-ts . = ts-debian-hvm-install nestedl1 nestedl2 run-ts . = ts-guest-stop nestedl1 nestedl2 run-ts . = ts-leak-check nestedl1 + check run-ts . = ts-logs-capture nestedl1 run-ts . = ts-guest-destroy + host nestedl1 } > > > Do you not want to run the steps in test-guest ? Perhaps it would be > > > better to add a host ident argument to test-guest{,-migr,-nomigr} ? > > > > > We do not plan to run the steps in test-guest currently. > > Why not ? > > Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |