[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST Nested PATCH v11 6/7] Compose the main recipe of nested test job
> -----Original Message----- > From: Ian Jackson [mailto:Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 11:42 PM > To: Pang, LongtaoX > Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx; wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx; Hu, > Robert > Subject: Re: [OSSTEST Nested PATCH v11 6/7] Compose the main recipe of nested > test job > > longtao.pang writes ("[OSSTEST Nested PATCH v11 6/7] Compose the main recipe > of nested test job"): > > The ident and guestname are same of 'nestedl1' for L1 guest VM. > > This is going in the right direction. > > I think arrangements need to be made to capture the logs for > nestedl1. > I am sorry, what logs do you mean? I noticed that there is one 'logs/standalone' directory inside osstest repo. There are job logs that already have run. > > +proc need-hosts/test-nested {} {return host} > > +proc run-job/test-nested {} { > > + run-ts . = ts-debian-hvm-install + host + nestedl1 > > + run-ts . = ts-nested-setup + host + nestedl1 > > + run-ts . = ts-xen-install nestedl1 > > + run-ts . = ts-host-reboot nestedl1 > > + run-ts . = ts-debian-hvm-install nestedl1 nestedl2 > > + run-ts . = ts-guest-stop nestedl1 nestedl2 > > + run-ts . = ts-guest-destroy + host + nestedl1 > > +} > > Very much a matter of taste, but can I suggest that `l1' and `l2' > might be better idents/guest names names ? > Yes, I will try it. > I think some extra +s in the l2 install and start operations might be > useful, because the testid probably doesn't need to mention nestedl1. > I am sorry, do you mean that I should add '+' for l2 installation, such as ' ts-debian-hvm-install + nestedl1 + nestedl2' ? > I think you probably want to run leak-check on the L1. > I have noticed the logs which printed on screen during job running, the leak-check will be run on L1 at the end of testing. Or, do you mean that I should run leak-check on L1 after the L1 HVM guest finishing installation? > Do you not want to run the steps in test-guest ? Perhaps it would be > better to add a host ident argument to test-guest{,-migr,-nomigr} ? > We do not plan to run the steps in test-guest currently. > Thanks, > Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |