|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V6 05/10] xen/arm64: gicv3: Use AFF1 when translating ICC_SGI1R_EL1 to cpumask
On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 20:56 +0800, Chen Baozi wrote:
> From: Chen Baozi <baozich@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> To support more than 16 vCPUs, we have to calculate cpumask with AFF1
> field value in ICC_SGI1R_EL1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Baozi <baozich@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> xen/include/asm-arm/gic_v3_defs.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c
> index 2bf5294..f2b78a4 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c
> @@ -972,13 +972,28 @@ write_ignore:
> return 1;
> }
>
> -static inline void gicv3_sgir_to_cpumask(cpumask_t *cpumask,
> +static inline int gicv3_sgir_to_cpumask(cpumask_t *cpumask,
> const register_t sgir)
> {
> unsigned long target_list;
> + uint16_t *target_bitmap;
> + unsigned int aff1;
>
> target_list = sgir & ICH_SGI_TARGETLIST_MASK;
> - bitmap_copy(cpumask_bits(cpumask), &target_list, ICH_SGI_TARGET_BITS);
> + /* We assume that only AFF1 is used in ICC_SGI1R_EL1. */
> + aff1 = (sgir >> ICH_SGI_AFFINITY_LEVEL(1)) & ICH_SGI_AFFx_MASK;
> +
> + /* There might be up to 4096 vCPUs with all bits in affinity 1
> + * are used, so we have to check whether it will overflow the
> + * bitmap array of cpumask_t.
> + */
> + if ( ((aff1 + 1) * ICH_SGI_TARGET_BITS) > NR_CPUS )
> + return 1;
> +
> + target_bitmap = (uint16_t *)cpumask_bits(cpumask);
> + target_bitmap[aff1] = target_list;
I think this is another argument for passing the cluster and target list
separately at the affinity level.
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int vgic_v3_to_sgi(struct vcpu *v, register_t sgir)
> @@ -996,8 +1011,15 @@ static int vgic_v3_to_sgi(struct vcpu *v, register_t
> sgir)
> switch ( irqmode )
> {
> case ICH_SGI_TARGET_LIST:
> - /* SGI's are injected at Rdist level 0. ignoring affinity 1, 2, 3 */
> - gicv3_sgir_to_cpumask(&vcpu_mask, sgir);
> + /*
> + * Currenty we assume only affinity level-1 is used in SGI's
"Currently"
> + * injection, ignoring level 2 & 3.
> + */
> + if ( gicv3_sgir_to_cpumask(&vcpu_mask, sgir) )
> + {
> + gprintk(XENLOG_WARNING, "Wrong affinity in SGI1R_EL register\n");
I don't think we need to log this. The guest has asked to send an SGI to
a VCPU which we know can't possibly exist. I'm not sure what real h/w
would do, but if it is e.g. UNPREDICTABLE then we should consider
killing the guest here. I suspect it's actually just ignored, in which
case we can silently do the same.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |