[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v23 12/15] x86/VPMU: Handle PMU interrupts for PV(H) guests
> @@ -201,27 +202,56 @@ static inline void context_load(struct vcpu *v) > } > } > > -static void amd_vpmu_load(struct vcpu *v) > +static int amd_vpmu_load(struct vcpu *v, bool_t from_guest) > { > struct vpmu_struct *vpmu = vcpu_vpmu(v); > - struct xen_pmu_amd_ctxt *ctxt = vpmu->context; > - uint64_t *ctrl_regs = vpmu_reg_pointer(ctxt, ctrls); > + struct xen_pmu_amd_ctxt *ctxt; > + uint64_t *ctrl_regs; > + unsigned int i; > > vpmu_reset(vpmu, VPMU_FROZEN); > > - if ( vpmu_is_set(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_LOADED) ) > + if ( !from_guest && vpmu_is_set(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_LOADED) ) > { > - unsigned int i; > + ctxt = vpmu->context; > + ctrl_regs = vpmu_reg_pointer(ctxt, ctrls); > > for ( i = 0; i < num_counters; i++ ) > wrmsrl(ctrls[i], ctrl_regs[i]); > > - return; > + return 0; > + } > + > + if ( from_guest ) > + { > + unsigned int num_enabled = 0; > + > + ASSERT(!is_hvm_vcpu(v)); > + > + ctxt = &vpmu->xenpmu_data->pmu.c.amd; > + ctrl_regs = vpmu_reg_pointer(ctxt, ctrls); > + for ( i = 0; i < num_counters; i++ ) > + { > + if ( (ctrl_regs[i] & CTRL_RSVD_MASK) != ctrl_rsvd[i] ) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + if ( is_pmu_enabled(ctrl_regs[i]) ) > + num_enabled++; > + } > + > + if ( num_enabled ) > + vpmu_set(vpmu, VPMU_RUNNING); > + else > + vpmu_reset(vpmu, VPMU_RUNNING); > + > + memcpy(vpmu->context, &vpmu->xenpmu_data->pmu.c.amd, ctxt_sz); For one, why don't you use ctxt here? And then I think I made very clear that all shared data must be read exactly once during any hypervisor operation. Yet afaict you do two reads (one in the verification loop above, and another in the memcpy()). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |