[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 05/19] xen: arm: Add and use r/o+raz and w/o+wi helpers
Hi Ian, On 16/04/2015 17:22, Ian Campbell wrote: On Fri, 2015-04-03 at 14:51 +0200, Julien Grall wrote:On 31/03/2015 12:07, Ian Campbell wrote:Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> --- xen/arch/arm/traps.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/traps.c b/xen/arch/arm/traps.c index 8b1846a..ebc09f9 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/traps.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/traps.c @@ -1587,6 +1587,34 @@ static void handle_raz_wi(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, advance_pc(regs, hsr); } +/* Write only + write ignore */ +static void handle_wo_wi(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, + register_t *reg,This helper handles WO and WI which doesn't require to modify the register. I would pass a register_t rather than register_t* in order to make clear that the register of the guest won't change.I deliberately made handle_* all have the same prototype for consistency. Ok. +/* Read only + read as zero */This comment may confuse developer who wants to implement RO register which another value than 0. I got confuse too. It would be nice to expand the comment for the RO case.I'm afraid I don't understand the confusion so I'm not sure how to clarify. What did you think this comment was saying? When I read the comment I though you were implemented two distinct part: RO and RAZ.As the value return by RO may not always be 0 (we have a handful of cases in traps.c), I didn't understand why you were implementing both within the same helper. Although this helper choose to implement RO as RAZ. So I think it would be good to mention it in order to avoid confusion later. Regards, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |