[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1 3/3] xen/arm: smmu: Renaming struct iommu_domain *domain to, struct iommu_domain *iommu_domain
- To: "Jaggi, Manish" <Manish.Jaggi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Julien Grall <julien.grall.oss@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:47:19 +0100
- Cc: "Prasun.kapoor@xxxxxxxxxx" <Prasun.kapoor@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Kumar, Vijaya" <Vijaya.Kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>, Xen Devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:47:56 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On 14/04/15 13:24, Jaggi, Manish wrote:
> [manish] Table is indeed a good option, but I think changing the name
> of arm_smmu_xen_device to something like arch_smmu_device make more
> sense as arm_smmu_xen_device and arm_smmu_device are not differentiable
> just by name.
Can you explain how arch_smmu_device and arm_smmu_device are easier to
differentiate? There is only 2 letters difference...
Also, what does "arch" stands for? The SMMU driver is already ARM
specific...
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
