[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 08/24] xen/arm: Allow virq != irq

To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:25:46 +0000
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tim@xxxxxxx, stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:26:40 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

Hi Ian,

On 20/02/15 15:52, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> As DOM0 will get most the devices, the vIRQ is equal to the IRQ in that case.
> 
> Am I correct that after this patch all callers still pass irq==virq to
> the new function?

Sorry, I forgot to answer to this question. Yes, all the callers will
pass irq == virq in case of DOM0.

Regards,

-- 
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 08/24] xen/arm: Allow virq != irq
  - From: Ian Campbell

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Crash in acpi_ps_peek_opcode when booting kernel 3.19 as Xen dom0
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Crash in acpi_ps_peek_opcode when booting kernel 3.19 as Xen dom0
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 08/24] xen/arm: Allow virq != irq
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 09/24] xen/arm: route_irq_to_guest: Check validity of the IRQ
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.