Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2 2/3] xen: scsiback: add LUN of restored domain

[Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>]

On 02/18/2015 06:02 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 02/17/2015 02:02 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > When a xen domain is being restored the LUN state of a pvscsi device
> > is "Connected" and not "Initialising" as in case of attaching a new
> > pvscsi LUN.
> >
> > This must be taken into account when adding a new pvscsi device for
> > a domain as otherwise the pvscsi LUN won't be connected to the
> > SCSI target associated with it.
>
> scsiback_do_add_lun() is being called from scsiback_frontend_changed()
> which eventually sets the state to Connected. Is the added test of
> 'try' an optimization or is it needed for correctness?
It's needed for correctness. In case of resume the translation entry
will be already existing, thus scsiback_add_translation_entry() will
return a value unequal to zero. We don't want to set the device state
to "Closed" in this case.

Juergen

> -boris
>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
> >   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c b/drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c
> > index 9faca6a..9d60176 100644
> > --- a/drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c
> > +++ b/drivers/xen/xen-scsiback.c
> > @@ -992,7 +992,7 @@ found:
> >   }
> >
> >   static void scsiback_do_add_lun(struct vscsibk_info *info, const
> > char *state,
> > -                char *phy, struct ids_tuple *vir)
> > +                char *phy, struct ids_tuple *vir, int try)
> >   {
> >       if (!scsiback_add_translation_entry(info, phy, vir)) {
> >           if (xenbus_printf(XBT_NIL, info->dev->nodename, state,
> > @@ -1000,7 +1000,7 @@ static void scsiback_do_add_lun(struct
> > vscsibk_info *info, const char *state,
> >               pr_err("xen-pvscsi: xenbus_printf error %s\n", state);
> >               scsiback_del_translation_entry(info, vir);
> >           }
> > -    } else {
> > +    } else if (!try) {
> >           xenbus_printf(XBT_NIL, info->dev->nodename, state,
> >                     "%d", XenbusStateClosed);
> >       }
> > @@ -1060,10 +1060,19 @@ static void scsiback_do_1lun_hotplug(struct
> > vscsibk_info *info, int op,
> >
> >       switch (op) {
> >       case VSCSIBACK_OP_ADD_OR_DEL_LUN:
> > -        if (device_state == XenbusStateInitialising)
> > -            scsiback_do_add_lun(info, state, phy, &vir);
> > -        if (device_state == XenbusStateClosing)
> > +        switch (device_state) {
> > +        case XenbusStateInitialising:
> > +            scsiback_do_add_lun(info, state, phy, &vir, 0);
> > +            break;
> > +        case XenbusStateConnected:
> > +            scsiback_do_add_lun(info, state, phy, &vir, 1);
> > +            break;
> > +        case XenbusStateClosing:
> >               scsiback_do_del_lun(info, state, &vir);
> > +            break;
> > +        default:
> > +            break;
> > +        }
> >           break;
> >
> >       case VSCSIBACK_OP_UPDATEDEV_STATE:
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel