Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 19/24] libxl: define LIBXL_HAVE_VNUMA

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Wei Liu writes ("Re: [PATCH v5 19/24] libxl: define LIBXL_HAVE_VNUMA"):
> There is no new API yet. Just new structure to specify vNUMA
> configuration.
> 
> How about this:
> 
> /* LIBXL_HAVE_VNUMA
>  *
>  * If this is defined, libxl's IDL has libxl_vnode_info and there is a
>  * array call vnuma_nodes inside libxl_domain_build_info to specify
>  * vNUMA configuration.
>  */

Yes, something like that.  It would be better if the precise wording
were more similar to that for the other HAVE macros.  How about:

   * If this is defined the type libxl_vnode_info exists, and a
   * field 'vnuma_nodes' is present in libxl_domain_build_info.

or similar ?

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel