Re: [Xen-devel] 3.19 + xen-devel: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/page-io.c:85!

[Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thursday, February 12, 2015, 12:28:35 PM, you wrote:

> Hello,

> El 12/02/15 a les 9.54, Sander Eikelenboom ha escrit:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> With a 3.19 kernel + xen-devel tree pulled on top i run into this splat 
>> below.
>> It's on a Xen PV-guest running a postgres database and doing a pg_dump at 
>> that
>> moment in time, after running for a while (within 2 days or so).
>> 
>> --
>> Sander
>> 
>> [139595.736073] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> [139595.736073] kernel BUG at fs/ext4/page-io.c:85!
>> [139595.736073] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
>> [139595.736073] Modules linked in:
>> [139595.736073] CPU: 0 PID: 25632 Comm: pg_dump Not tainted 
>> 3.19.0-20150209-doflr-xendevel-edid+ #1
>> [139595.736073] task: ffff8800f8fd10c0 ti: ffff88006bc70000 task.ti: 
>> ffff88006bc70000
>> [139595.736073] RIP: e030:[<ffffffff8126826f>]  [<ffffffff8126826f>] 
>> ext4_finish_bio+0x24f/0x260
>> [139595.736073] RSP: e02b:ffff8800fac03bc8  EFLAGS: 00010046
>> [139595.736073] RAX: 004000000002002c RBX: ffff880060fa6170 RCX: 
>> 0000000000000034
>> [139595.736073] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffea00014a77c0 RDI: 
>> ffff8800f9357300
>> [139595.736073] RBP: ffff8800fac03c58 R08: 0000000000000009 R09: 
>> 0000000000016830
>> [139595.736073] R10: ffff8800ff820680 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 
>> 0000000000000000
>> [139595.736073] R13: ffff88006bf111a0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 
>> ffffea0000cd1800
>> [139595.736073] FS:  00007f623b3f7720(0000) GS:ffff8800fac00000(0000) 
>> knlGS:0000000000000000
>> [139595.736073] CS:  e033 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
>> [139595.736073] CR2: ffffffffff600400 CR3: 0000000091907000 CR4: 
>> 0000000000000660
>> [139595.736073] Stack:
>> [139595.736073]  ffff8800fac03be8 ffffffff81bc11c2 ffffffff83140070 
>> ffff8800fac03cc6
>> [139595.736073]  ffff8800f9357300 00001000244d0001 004000000000002c 
>> 0000001700000000
>> [139595.736073]  0000000000000000 0000000000000002 ffff8800fac03c98 
>> ffffffff8110582d
>> [139595.736073] Call Trace:
>> [139595.736073]  <IRQ>
>> [139595.736073]  [<ffffffff81bc11c2>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x52/0x90
>> [139595.736073]  [<ffffffff8110582d>] ? lock_acquire+0xed/0x110
>> [139595.736073]  [<ffffffff81268698>] ext4_end_bio+0x58/0x110
>> [139595.736073]  [<ffffffff8144dea3>] bio_endio+0x53/0x90
>> [139595.736073]  [<ffffffff81453850>] blk_update_request+0x80/0x300
>> [139595.736073]  [<ffffffff81453af2>] blk_update_bidi_request+0x22/0x90
>> [139595.736073]  [<ffffffff8145451b>] __blk_end_bidi_request+0x1b/0x40
>> [139595.736073]  [<ffffffff8145455a>] __blk_end_request_all+0x1a/0x30
>> [139595.736073]  [<ffffffff816e59d1>] blkif_interrupt+0x731/0x8c0

> AFAICT the crash is due to the ext4 code not finding it's private data
> embedded in the page. xen-blkfront doesn't use page->private at all, so
> I'm not sure who is touching this. The only Xen specific code that
touches page->>private is the p2m code. Was the domain
> saved/restored/migrated?

> Roger.

Hi Roger,

Nope, no saving/restoring or migration.

What *could* be happening in the mean time would be LVM making and 
operating on a snapshot in dom0 of the same logical LVM partition.
But AFIAK that shouldn't matter.

--
Sander


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel