|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V4 01/13] xen/mem_event: Cleanup of mem_event structures
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Tamas K Lengyel <tamas.lengyel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 02/10/15 2:51 PM >>>
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> On 09.02.15 at 19:53, <tamas.lengyel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> @@ -598,6 +600,12 @@ int mem_sharing_sharing_resume(struct domain *d)
>>>> {
>>>> struct vcpu *v;
>>>>
>>>> + if ( rsp.version != MEM_EVENT_INTERFACE_VERSION )
>>>> + {
>>>> + gdprintk(XENLOG_WARNING, "mem_event interface version
>>>> mismatch!\n");
>>>
>>> Why gdprintk()?
>>
>>Is that only for debug cases?
>
> I'm intending to propose compiling out alll dprintk() and gdprintk() instance
> in
> non-debug builds. Right now they're preferable when the message is so terse
> that identifying its origin without file name and line number is difficult.
> Clearly
> any non-debug messages shouldn't be of such poor quality.
I willwrap it into #ifndef NDEBUG as it is really only for debugging.
>
>>>> @@ -1310,18 +1322,19 @@ void p2m_mem_paging_resume(struct domain *d)
>>>> /* Fix p2m entry if the page was not dropped */
>>>> if ( !(rsp.flags & MEM_EVENT_FLAG_DROP_PAGE) )
>>>> {
>>>> - gfn_lock(p2m, rsp.gfn, 0);
>>>> - mfn = p2m->get_entry(p2m, rsp.gfn, &p2mt, &a, 0, NULL);
>>>> + uint64_t gfn = rsp.u.mem_access.gfn;
>>>> + gfn_lock(p2m, gfn, 0);
>>>
>>> Blank line between declarations and statements. Also - why uint64_t
>>> instead of just unsigned long?
>>
>>The type of mem_access.gfn is uint64_t so its that for consistency.
>
> And the type most functions taking a gfn expect is unsigned long.
>
> Jan
Well, we need to have it as uint64_t in the shared public struct
definition so that the width of it is explicit. Unsigned long may be
32-bit depending on the compiler so it is going to be casted
somewhere. Whether it is preferred to be casted when assigned to a
local variable or when passed to the function is just a style question
- I'm fine with either.
Tamas
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |