[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [v8][PATCH 04/17] update the existing hypercall to support XEN_DOMCTL_set_rdm
- To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
- From: Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:13:25 +0100
- Cc: "wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx" <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>, "ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx" <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>, "stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>, "Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>, "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 16:13:49 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
Hi Kevin,
At 14:09 +0100 on 11 Dec (1418303386), Tim Deegan wrote:
> At 02:03 +0000 on 11 Dec (1418259797), Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > From: Tim Deegan [mailto:tim@xxxxxxx]
> > > Now since the code's not going to be in 4.5 anyway, it should be
> > > possible to _develop_ it in this manner, possibly in a private branch,
> > > even if the early stages aren't getting applied immediately. We
> > > should be able to set up an rmrr branch on the public servers if that
> > > helps. But again, that relies on having a design worked out in
> > > advance that both developers and maintainers are (within reason)
> > > committed to.
> >
> > that's a good suggestion. We'll send out a design review today, and then
> > based on discussion we can see whether making sense to do such
> > incremental way.
>
> Sounds good!
I haven't seen this design doc yet -- if I missed it can someone point
me to it?
Cheers,
Tim.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
