[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [v8][PATCH 02/17] introduce XEN_DOMCTL_set_rdm
>>> On 09.12.14 at 02:06, <tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Also how does this work with 32-bit dom0s? Is there a need to use the >>>> compat layer? >>> >>> Are you saying in xsm case? Others? >>> >>> Actually this new DOMCTL is similar with XEN_DOMCTL_assign_device in some >>> senses but I don't see such an issue you're pointing. >> >> I was thinking about the compat layer and making sure it works properly. > > Do we really need this consideration? I mean I referred to that existing > XEN_DOMCTL_assign_device to implement this new DOMCTL, but looks there's > nothing related to this point. > > Or could you make your thought clear to me with an exiting example? Then > I can take a look at what exactly should be taken in my new DOMCTL since > I'm a fresh man to work out this properly inside xen. I think Konrad got a little confused here - domctl-s intentionally are structured so that they don't need a compat translation layer. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |