[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-netfront: Fix handling packets on compound pages with skb_linearize
On 08/12/14 10:19, Luis Henriques wrote: > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 09:55:24AM +0100, Stefan Bader wrote: >> On 11.08.2014 19:32, Zoltan Kiss wrote: >>> There is a long known problem with the netfront/netback interface: if the >>> guest >>> tries to send a packet which constitues more than MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1 ring >>> slots, >>> it gets dropped. The reason is that netback maps these slots to a frag in >>> the >>> frags array, which is limited by size. Having so many slots can occur since >>> compound pages were introduced, as the ring protocol slice them up into >>> individual (non-compound) page aligned slots. The theoretical worst case >>> scenario looks like this (note, skbs are limited to 64 Kb here): >>> linear buffer: at most PAGE_SIZE - 17 * 2 bytes, overlapping page boundary, >>> using 2 slots >>> first 15 frags: 1 + PAGE_SIZE + 1 bytes long, first and last bytes are at >>> the >>> end and the beginning of a page, therefore they use 3 * 15 = 45 slots >>> last 2 frags: 1 + 1 bytes, overlapping page boundary, 2 * 2 = 4 slots >>> Although I don't think this 51 slots skb can really happen, we need a >>> solution >>> which can deal with every scenario. In real life there is only a few slots >>> overdue, but usually it causes the TCP stream to be blocked, as the retry >>> will >>> most likely have the same buffer layout. >>> This patch solves this problem by linearizing the packet. This is not the >>> fastest way, and it can fail much easier as it tries to allocate a big >>> linear >>> area for the whole packet, but probably easier by an order of magnitude than >>> anything else. Probably this code path is not touched very frequently >>> anyway. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> This does not seem to be marked explicitly as stable. Has someone already >> asked >> David Miller to put it on his stable queue? IMO it qualifies quite well and >> the >> actual change should be simple to pick/backport. >> > > Thank you Stefan, I'm queuing this for the next 3.16 kernel release. Don't backport this yes. It's broken. It produces malformed requests and netback will report a fatal error and stop all traffic on the VIF. David _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |