Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: Cleaning up the Mini-OS namespace

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 2014-12-07 at 18:54 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Martin Lucina, le Fri 05 Dec 2014 19:22:08 +0100, a Ãcrit :
> > What's up with the -DHAVE_LIBC codepaths in mini-os? Who or what uses
> > these? Grepping around in stubdom/ doesn't come up with anything...
> 
> HAVE_LIBC gets defined by extra/mini-os/Config.mk when libc is y, and
> libc is defined to $(stubdom), which is set to y from stubdom/Makefile
> 
> Basically everything in stubdom/ uses HAVE_LIBC.
> 
> I don't know where the qemu-stubdom part is currently stored, but it
> uses it too.

I think its in the regular qemu-xen-traditional git tree aka
git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen-unstable.git.

There's isn't any stub qemu-xen-upstream yet.

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel