Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] have architectures specify the number of PIRQs a hardware domain gets

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 2014-12-05 at 14:36 +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 05/12/14 14:27, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-12-05 at 13:51 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>  #define nr_static_irqs NR_IRQS
> >> +#define arch_hwdom_irqs(domid) NR_IRQS
> > 
> > FWIW gic_number_lines() is the ARM equivalent of getting the number of
> > GSIs.
> > 
> > *BUT* we don't actually use pirqs on ARM (everything goes via the
> > virtualised interrupt controller). So maybe we should be setting
> > nr_pirqs to 0 on ARM. I appreciate you likely want such a patch to come
> > from an ARM person, so I'm fine with you making this NR_IRQS in the
> > meantime.
> 
> As we already know that PIRQ is not used on ARM, it would make sense to
> use directly in this patch 0.

Are you offering to give a tested-by if Jan posts such a patch?

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel