Re: [Xen-devel] A few EFI code questions

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 04.12.14 at 22:22, <roy.franz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 1:35 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> On 03.12.14 at 22:02, <daniel.kiper@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 3) Should not we change xen/arch/*/efi/efi-boot.h to
>>>    xen/arch/*/efi/efi-boot.c? efi-boot.h contains more
>>>    code than definitions, declarations and short static
>>>    functions. So, I think that it is more regular *.c file
>>>    than header file.
>>
>> That's a matter of taste - I'd probably have made it .c too, but
>> didn't mind it being .h as done by Roy (presumably on the basis
>> that #include directives are preferred to have .h files as their
>> operands). The only thing I regret is that I didn't ask for the
>> pointless efi- prefix to be dropped.
> 
> I don't mind a change here, and I agree that it is more like a .c file
> than a .h.  If a name change is done, is it worth dropping the "efi-" at
> the same time?

If we indeed want to change the name (post 4.5), making both
adjustments at once would be kind of a requirement of mine.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel