|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.5 random freeze question
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014, Andrii Tseglytskyi wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Stefano Stabellini
> <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Nov 2014, Andrii Tseglytskyi wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Andrii Tseglytskyi
> >> <andrii.tseglytskyi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Stefano Stabellini
> >> > <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, 19 Nov 2014, Andrii Tseglytskyi wrote:
> >> >>> Hi Stefano,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Stefano Stabellini
> >> >>> <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >>> > On Wed, 19 Nov 2014, Andrii Tseglytskyi wrote:
> >> >>> >> Hi Stefano,
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> > > if ( !list_empty(¤t->arch.vgic.lr_pending) &&
> >> >>> >> > > lr_all_full() )
> >> >>> >> > > - GICH[GICH_HCR] |= GICH_HCR_UIE;
> >> >>> >> > > + GICH[GICH_HCR] |= GICH_HCR_NPIE;
> >> >>> >> > > else
> >> >>> >> > > - GICH[GICH_HCR] &= ~GICH_HCR_UIE;
> >> >>> >> > > + GICH[GICH_HCR] &= ~GICH_HCR_NPIE;
> >> >>> >> > >
> >> >>> >> > > }
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > Yes, exactly
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> I tried, hang still occurs with this change
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > We need to figure out why during the hang you still have all the LRs
> >> >>> > busy even if you are getting maintenance interrupts that should cause
> >> >>> > them to be cleared.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I see that I have free LRs during maintenance interrupt
> >> >>>
> >> >>> (XEN) gic.c:871:d0v0 maintenance interrupt
> >> >>> (XEN) GICH_LRs (vcpu 0) mask=0
> >> >>> (XEN) HW_LR[0]=9a015856
> >> >>> (XEN) HW_LR[1]=0
> >> >>> (XEN) HW_LR[2]=0
> >> >>> (XEN) HW_LR[3]=0
> >> >>> (XEN) Inflight irq=86 lr=0
> >> >>> (XEN) Inflight irq=2 lr=255
> >> >>> (XEN) Pending irq=2
> >> >>>
> >> >>> But I see that after I got hang - maintenance interrupts are generated
> >> >>> continuously. Platform continues printing the same log till reboot.
> >> >>
> >> >> Exactly the same log? As in the one above you just pasted?
> >> >> That is very very suspicious.
> >> >
> >> > Yes exactly the same log. And looks like it means that LRs are flushed
> >> > correctly.
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> I am thinking that we are not handling GICH_HCR_UIE correctly and
> >> >> something we do in Xen, maybe writing to an LR register, might trigger a
> >> >> new maintenance interrupt immediately causing an infinite loop.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Yes, this is what I'm thinking about. Taking in account all collected
> >> > debug info it looks like once LRs are overloaded with SGIs -
> >> > maintenance interrupt occurs.
> >> > And then it is not handled properly, and occurs again and again - so
> >> > platform hangs inside its handler.
> >> >
> >> >> Could you please try this patch? It disable GICH_HCR_UIE immediately on
> >> >> hypervisor entry.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Now trying.
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> >> >> index 4d2a92d..6ae8dc4 100644
> >> >> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> >> >> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> >> >> @@ -701,6 +701,8 @@ void gic_clear_lrs(struct vcpu *v)
> >> >> if ( is_idle_vcpu(v) )
> >> >> return;
> >> >>
> >> >> + GICH[GICH_HCR] &= ~GICH_HCR_UIE;
> >> >> +
> >> >> spin_lock_irqsave(&v->arch.vgic.lock, flags);
> >> >>
> >> >> while ((i = find_next_bit((const unsigned long *)
> >> >> &this_cpu(lr_mask),
> >> >> @@ -821,12 +823,8 @@ void gic_inject(void)
> >> >>
> >> >> gic_restore_pending_irqs(current);
> >> >>
> >> >> -
> >> >> if ( !list_empty(¤t->arch.vgic.lr_pending) && lr_all_full() )
> >> >> GICH[GICH_HCR] |= GICH_HCR_UIE;
> >> >> - else
> >> >> - GICH[GICH_HCR] &= ~GICH_HCR_UIE;
> >> >> -
> >> >> }
> >> >>
> >> >> static void do_sgi(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, int othercpu, enum
> >> >> gic_sgi sgi)
> >> >
> >>
> >> Heh - I don't see hangs with this patch :) But also I see that
> >> maintenance interrupt doesn't occur (and no hang as result)
> >> Stefano - is this expected?
> >
> > No maintenance interrupts at all? That's strange. You should be
> > receiving them when LRs are full and you still have interrupts pending
> > to be added to them.
> >
> > You could add another printk here to see if you should be receiving
> > them:
> >
> > if ( !list_empty(¤t->arch.vgic.lr_pending) && lr_all_full() )
> > + {
> > + gdprintk(XENLOG_DEBUG, "requesting maintenance interrupt\n");
> > GICH[GICH_HCR] |= GICH_HCR_UIE;
> > - else
> > - GICH[GICH_HCR] &= ~GICH_HCR_UIE;
> > -
> > + }
> > }
> >
>
> Requested properly:
>
> (XEN) gic.c:756:d0v0 requesting maintenance interrupt
> (XEN) gic.c:756:d0v0 requesting maintenance interrupt
> (XEN) gic.c:756:d0v0 requesting maintenance interrupt
> (XEN) gic.c:756:d0v0 requesting maintenance interrupt
> (XEN) gic.c:756:d0v0 requesting maintenance interrupt
> (XEN) gic.c:756:d0v0 requesting maintenance interrupt
> (XEN) gic.c:756:d0v0 requesting maintenance interrupt
>
> But does not occur
OK, let's see what's going on then by printing the irq number of the
maintenance interrupt:
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
index 4d2a92d..fed3167 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ static struct {
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(uint64_t, lr_mask);
static uint8_t nr_lrs;
+static bool uie_on;
#define lr_all_full() (this_cpu(lr_mask) == ((1 << nr_lrs) - 1))
/* The GIC mapping of CPU interfaces does not necessarily match the
@@ -694,6 +695,7 @@ void gic_clear_lrs(struct vcpu *v)
{
int i = 0;
unsigned long flags;
+ unsigned long hcr;
/* The idle domain has no LRs to be cleared. Since gic_restore_state
* doesn't write any LR registers for the idle domain they could be
@@ -701,6 +703,13 @@ void gic_clear_lrs(struct vcpu *v)
if ( is_idle_vcpu(v) )
return;
+ hcr = GICH[GICH_HCR];
+ if ( hcr & GICH_HCR_UIE )
+ {
+ GICH[GICH_HCR] &= ~GICH_HCR_UIE;
+ uie_on = 1;
+ }
+
spin_lock_irqsave(&v->arch.vgic.lock, flags);
while ((i = find_next_bit((const unsigned long *) &this_cpu(lr_mask),
@@ -865,6 +873,11 @@ void gic_interrupt(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, int is_fiq)
intack = GICC[GICC_IAR];
irq = intack & GICC_IA_IRQ;
+ if ( uie_on )
+ {
+ uie_on = 0;
+ printk("received maintenance interrupt irq=%d\n", irq);
+ }
if ( likely(irq >= 16 && irq < 1021) )
{
local_irq_enable();
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |