[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] IPI sending difference between x86 and ARM
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 11:10 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 10.09.14 at 12:01, <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Anyway, if smp_send_event_check_mask is supposed to exclude the calling > > CPU then we should fix that on ARM in the name of consistency/sanity. In > > the event it causes other issues then we should fix those as they arise. > > Actually I was instead considering to filter the local CPU in > cpumask_raise_softirq(), just like cpu_raise_softirq() does. That > would make changes to smp_send_event_check_mask() > unnecessary. Sure, that would be fine and good too. But independent of that I think smp_send_event_check_mask() should behave the same on x86 as ARM wrt including the current CPU. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |