[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] IPI sending difference between x86 and ARM
All, is it intentional that gicv2_send_SGI() (and all of the higher layers) keep the sending CPU in the target mask, while all x86's send_IPI_mask_...() specifically exclude the local CPU? I'm asking namely in the context of cpumask_raise_softirq(), which - other than cpu_raise_softirq() - does not itself exclude the local CPU (and hence I wonder whether adding that check would have the potential of breaking ARM). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |