[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/25] Replace DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE macro use
- To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Benoit Taine <benoit.taine@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 19:12:43 +0200
- Cc: "linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fbdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>, DRI mailing list <dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ath5k-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-acenic@xxxxxxxxxx, "linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jingoo Han <jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx>, ath10k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-hippi@xxxxxxxxxx, industrypack-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-wireless <linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ath9k-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, wil6210@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-pcmcia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-can@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mmc <linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "e1000-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <e1000-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:12:52 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On 21/07/2014 17:16, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Jingoo]
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:50 PM, James Bottomley
> > Anyway, it's PCI code ... let the PCI maintainer decide. However, if he
> > does want this do it as one big bang patch via either the PCI or Trivial
> > tree (latter because JiÅÃ has experience doing this, but the former
> > might be useful so the decider feels the pain ...)
>
> I don't feel strongly either way, so I guess I'm OK with this, and in
> the spirit of feeling the pain, I'm willing to handle it. Jingoo
> proposed similar patches, so it might be nice to give him some credit.
>
> Benoit, how about if you wait until about half-way through the merge
> window after v3.16 releases, generate an up-to-date single patch, and
> post that? Then we can try to get it in before v3.17-rc1 to minimize
> merge hassles.
Sure, I will do this.
--
BenoÃt Taine
Master cycle intern
Regal Team. LIP6
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
