[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/11] mini-os: xenbus changes for rump kernels

Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/11] mini-os: xenbus 
changes for rump kernels"):
> On 20/06/14 20:04, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > But before I ask the rump kernel developers to pull my nontrivial
> > changes, I felt I should give the Xen community a chance to object.
> > Hence this RFC series.
> Are these changes indented for the Xen tree, or the rump fork tree?

These are for the rump fork tree, which already exists and has
diverged (and not by me).  I intend to try to unify them again but not

> It would be preferable to try and avoid forks, if that can be achieved
> by cleaning up the existing minios tree to be more amenable to extending
> without having to hack at it?

Contributions of effort welcome :-).

>  I seem to remember the Mirage people expressing similar views.



Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.