[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH ARM v4 11/12] mini-os: get GIC addresses from FDT
Hi Thomas, On 06/18/2014 04:08 PM, Thomas Leonard wrote: > //#define VGIC_DEBUG > #ifdef VGIC_DEBUG > @@ -168,9 +169,38 @@ static void gic_handler(void) { > } > > void gic_init(void) { > - // FIXME Get from dt! > - gic.gicd_base = (char *)0x2c001000ULL; > - gic.gicc_base = (char *)0x2c002000ULL; > + gic.gicd_base = NULL; Any reason to not fold this patch in patch #7? Or better move the gic code in a separate patch? This would avoid to hardcode a GIC address which is completely wrong with Xen unstable. > + int node = 0; > + int depth = 0; > + for (;;) > + { > + node = fdt_next_node(device_tree, node, &depth); > + if (node <= 0 || depth < 0) > + break; > + > + /* > + int name_len = 0; > + const char *name = fdt_get_name(device_tree, node, &name_len); > + printk("Found node: %d (%.*s)\n", node, name_len, name); > + */ This should be drop. > + > + if (fdt_getprop(device_tree, node, "interrupt-controller", NULL)) { You have to check the compatible string here. > + int len = 0; > + const uint64_t *reg = fdt_getprop(device_tree, node, "reg", > &len); > + if (reg == NULL || len != 32) { You made assumption of the layout of the device tree provided by Xen: - #address-cells == #size-cells == 2 - regs contains a valid physical address, i.e the device is not under a bus This can be changed by the toolstack in the future and will likely break mini-os. I would add a layer to support FDT address and interrupt translation correctly. I'm not the maintainer of the mini-os, so I let them decide :). I think, FreeBSD provides a good library for the translation (see sys/dev/fdt/fdt_common.c). I spent lots of time to play with device tree on Xen side, so I can help you if you needed. -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |