[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] switch hypercall restart indication from -EAGAIN to -ERESTART

>>> On 15.05.14 at 14:01, <tim@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> At 12:56 +0100 on 15 May (1400154975), Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 15.05.14 at 13:24, <tim@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Are there cases where we want to return EINTR to the guest, or could
>> > we maybe use it everywhere and drop ERESTART?
>> No, we need two distinct error codes on these paths. For now we
>> never need to return -EINTR to the guest (and for now I also can't
>> see when/why we would), but we'd have to convert these too
>> should the need arise.
> I didn't really understand that.  Do you mean that there's a reason to
> have both EINTR and ERESTART even though we don't return EINTR to
> guests, or that you want to keep them separate in case we ever do
> want to return EINTR?

The former.


Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.