[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] Hvmloader: Modify ACPI to only supply _EJ0 methods for PCIslots that support hotplug by runtime patching
- To: "Gonglei (Arei)" <arei.gonglei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 10:51:26 +0100
- Cc: "Huangweidong \(C\)" <weidong.huang@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx" <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Hanweidong \(Randy\)" <hanweidong@xxxxxxxxxx>, "stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "qemu-devel@xxxxxxxxxx" <qemu-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "fabio.fantoni@xxxxxxx" <fabio.fantoni@xxxxxxx>, "johannes.krampf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <johannes.krampf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "mst@xxxxxxxxxx" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>, "anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx" <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Gaowei\(UVP\)" <gao.gaowei@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Fri, 09 May 2014 09:51:39 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
>>> On 09.05.14 at 11:45, <arei.gonglei@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxx]
>> And it also seem pretty pointless to send a v4 without addressing
>> all comments you got on v3.
>>
> I don't think so. I have absorbed Ian's all suggestion on v3. And for other
> questions have been answered too, in despite of is me or not.
Did I overlook then your response to him asking for alternatives
to the run time patching?
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
