Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 4/9] Clear AC bit in RFLAGS to protect Xen itself by SMAP

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 29/04/14 11:29, Wu, Feng wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 5:48 PM
>> To: Wu, Feng
>> Cc: andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx; ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx; Dong, Eddie;
>> Nakajima, Jun; Tian, Kevin; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 4/9] Clear AC bit in RFLAGS to protect Xen itself by 
>> SMAP
>>
>>>>> On 29.04.14 at 11:27, <feng.wu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> May I move the definition of SAVE_ALL (or more related code, such as,
>>> SAVE_VOLATILE, etc.) from " xen/include/asm-x86/x86_64/asm_defns.h " to "
>>> xen/include/asm-x86/asm_defns.h ", since I got an build error after adding a
>>> parameter to marco SAVE_ALL like this, which makes me think it should be
>>> defined after ASM_CLAC?
>> No problem (and in fact I wouldn't mind you merging all of
>> x86_64/asm_defns.h into the other file - that due at some point
>> anyway), but I'm afraid we'd want this to be yet another separate
>> prerequisite patch - not sure if you're up to that, or if you wouldn't
>> find it simpler to keep SAVE_ALL being a C macro then.
> I am fine with the merging task. But Is there anything hard to handle while 
> merging x86_64/asm_defns.h to asm_defns.h, I am wondering
> why x86_64/asm_defns.h is there for a long time.

Because x86_32/asm_defns.h used to exist when we supported building Xen
as 32bit.  I wouldn't have thought there is anything problematic to be
encountered while merging the files.

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel