|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 18/21] xen/arm: p2m: Clean cache PT when the IOMMU doesn't support coherent walk
On 04/28/2014 03:09 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> xen/arch/arm/p2m.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
>> xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c | 11 +++++++++++
>> xen/include/xen/iommu.h | 5 +++++
>> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c b/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c
>> index 21219de..996d2bd 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c
>> @@ -274,6 +274,18 @@ enum p2m_operation {
>> CACHEFLUSH,
>> };
>>
>> +static void unmap_coherent_domain_page(struct domain *d, const void *va)
>> +{
>> + /* Some IOMMU doesn't support coherent PT walk. When the p2m is
>
> "don't support"
>
>> + * shared with the CPU, Xen has to make sure that the PT changes have
>> + * reached the memory
>> + */
>> + if ( need_iommu(d) && !iommu_has_feature(d, IOMMU_FEAT_COHERENT_WALK) )
>> + clean_xen_dcache_va_range(va, PAGE_SIZE);
>
> This is a fairly large hammer when you might only have touched a few
> bytes, if any, in the page.
>
> Wouldn't it be better to do this is write_pte, or just after the calls
> to write_pte?
I didn't think that the cache flush on a page was divided in small chunks.
> iommu_has_feature has a lot of callbacks -- worth calling once in
> apply_p2m_changes?
I will create a write_pte_coherent helpers which will take in parameter
a boolean to know if we need to flush the cache or not.
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |